An Investigation Into Smes Survival and the Discrimination Between Fgsmes and All Other Smes

Introduction In a free-enterprise(a) global market, micro, petty and peculiar(a)ty-sized enterprises (SMEs) play an increasingly grave role in a nations economy. Today they subscribe a substantial contribution to labor creation, concept, as well as entrepreneurial skills. A report conducted by European Commision(2005) utter that in the en massived European Union of 25 countries, 23 meg SMEs provide about 75 unrivalled million million million crafts and account for 99% of all enterprise. SMEs ar as well as the vital attributes for lifting the crossingiveness of economy.This is in the first place be sweat SMEs argon been considered as having a primordial role to play in providing in the raw products. Take UK for example, SMEs hand oer turn much and to a great extent dynamic. SMEs have enjoyed higher productivity harvesting than too large levels since 1998, and the equalizer of SME employers insurance coverage that they have undertaken either product or servi ce innovation in the outgoing 12 months has summationd from 32% in 2005 to 48% in 2006(BERR,2002). An cardinal manifestation of SMEs, especially for the young SMEs, is their survival set, tally to Haugh and McKee(2000), survival means continue to constitute in the future.Although we have haven a large increase in clean troupe formations and higher levels of their survival rates than the past, we tailnot non execution of instrument the fact that the rate of deceiveure of these SMEs is also very high. around of the stiffs fail in their infancy stage and some fail within several years by and by start-up. Some statistics suggest that the failure rate of SMEs in their first five years is more than 50% (Reiss, 2006). There ar more sympathys that run to SMEs failure shy(predicate) capital, poor counseling skills, poor valet de chambre resources, escape of innovations and so on. Factors that contribute to small-scale course survival and non-survivalIn rules of o rder to prosper, all SMEs need to ensure that they are alert both to opportunities for achieving success and threats to their survival. precisely when the company are aware of and gage with these instruments correctly, they go off survive, arise and succeed. 1. pecuniary muckle 1. 1 Access to Finance Obtaining the just pay is a pivotal factor to a new veritable(a)s survival and high step-up. For SMEs, in that location are various types of finance unattached, including bank bestows, adoption from family and friends, obtaining equity investment from trading angels, adventure capitals and so on.Obviously, disparate options have different profits and constraints. The advantage of contribute finance is that it will not dilute self-will twist of the warm. up to now, excessive conviction on loan finance could be a pecuniary threat to their devoteds solvency. Astebro and Bernhardt (2003) stated that there was a meaning(a) negative cor sexual intercourse in the midst of having a bank loan and the survival of the business. Since loan means a continuing obligations for the firm to repay the principal debt and associated interest on a predetermined sentencetable.This kind of loan covenants can place strain on a firms bullion flow position, if a firms capital contains a high proportion of debt, then the firm has to generate more cash to cover the repayment obligations, nonetheless it whitethorn have greater threat to default due to a jerky interruption in income. 1. 2 Financial Health A sarcastic reason for SMEs failure is that they cannot identify and react to threats to their financial wellnessy. For example, the substantial increases in overheads could be a threat to financial healthy since it is a signal of weak cost vigilance.importantly increasing overheads will expurgate the available cash flows and profits, until nowtually reduce the luck of survival. According to Schaefer (2006), over-expansion is a leading cause of busines s failure. This often happens when business owners shame success with how fast they can refine their business. A large amount of nonstarter is due to rapidly expanding firms. Birley and Niktari (1995) form that, in the opinion of many accountants and bank managers, 70% of SMEs failures were ca employ by a very large extent to being under-capitalized, to short-term liquidness problems or insufficient working capital.So in order to survive, firms have to belief out for financial threats to the firms solvency and maintain in force(p) attention look into over their finances. 2. gentleman capital In most SMEs, authority is centralized in the hands of the owner-managers and the owner-managers eer play multiple roles in a company, including general manager, sales manager, production manager, financial manager and so on, so that characteristics of the owner-managers, such as education background, family business background, private goals, previous work experience, strategic k nowingness have a significantly jolt on firms activities and performance.several(prenominal) studies indicate that in SMEs, the personality of the owner-managers is a critical determinant of corporate structure and strategy(Miller and Droge 1986 Miller and Toulouse 1986). Owner-managers who are in superpower to motivate staff, rarely listen to opposites advices, have runty knowledge of marketing strategy, finance, and personnel management may act as a significant constraint to SMEs survival. On the former(a) hand, owner-managers are not experts at everything, many owner-managers in small firms are deprivation of the leadership and management skills which are requisite for the firms survival and harvest-tide.Deakins and Freel (1998) found that one of the critical factors in the success of a SME was the might to build an entrepreneurial group. The kindly movement of a diversified management squad may imply a greater variety of complementary skills marketing skills, busines s skills, as well as proficient skills, this is also crucial for SMEs in relation to the long term success of the firm. So building a entrepreneurial team up will definitely increase SMEs viability. 3. Over-dependentSome firms do not have the becharm strategy and become excessive reliance on a single leaf node or a small node base. The more a firm relies on a particular client, the more peradventure it is damaged by factors out of its control than if it has a wide client base. Natwest (1997) stated that an important reason for SMEs failure is over-reliance on one or two guests and lose of sales. Failures often occur due to firms mend customer with leting its orders or going bankrupt. The same principles also apply to a firms supplier base.If there is a breakdown in the commercial alliance between the firm and its single supplier, the prodution of the firm will be damaged. As a answer, if a young firm wants to survive, it should judge to cultivate a wide client (supplier ) base instead of depending on a small deem of regular clients (suppliers). However diversification strategy can pass water this. Diversification across production and go can satisfy different types of customers and reduce the probability of over-dependent. 4. educateOne of the factors that contribute to SMEs failure is low level of management performance and inefficient operation, which is a result of lack of learning. It is generally acknowledged that the mass of the small-firm owners run their business just base on their own experience and popular sense, without getting professional or other formal qualifications. Stanworth and Gray (1992) pointed out that minority of small-firm owners who participate in management reproduction execute to have better educational qualifications, and their businesses have better survival and growth rates than other small firms.Also, Kitson and Wilkinson (1998) found a positive link between reproduction and innovation and growth, as tra ining was provided by 60% of innovating firms but solely 41% of non-innovators, and 72% and 68% of medium and fast-growing firms, respectively, compared with 46% of stagnant and declining firms. Training could cover a wide vomit up of areas including accessing to and managing finance, cost management, personnel management, marketing strategy, development use and retrieval, operation management and so on, which equip small-firm owners and employees with the skills necessary to survival and the farther growth.So training is also an important factor that contributes to small firms survival which can be easily ignored. 5. Innovation In this era of knowledge economy, innovation become inextricably linked with a firms survival, successful entrepreneurship everlastingly relies hard on innovation. It is extremely important for new small firms who still enter industries where economics of scale plays a critical role, by innovation small firms could compete on the basis of added value, t herefore enhancing the likelihood of survival.On the other hand, innovation intrinsically linked with a companys diversification strategy, through innovative activity, firms have the happening to produce new products and services so that they can attract more customers and increase their market share. Also, cost reduction can be come upond by innovation in operation processes, marketing and organizational forms. For example, in order to expand, some firms may consume a strategy called e-marketing to reduce cost, they may create a impressive and special site to grab peoples attention, on the website, a convenient online change system is provided.Also, the firm may ventilate their new products and services details to their sign customers and potential customers, some clippings combining with even fun facts. So business innovation is especially important not but for large companies but also SMEs survival, lack of innovation could be a restriction to a small firms growth. Discri mination between fast growth firms and all other SMEs Different SME tends to have different growth rate, some of them grow rapidly and are recognized as FGSMEs(fast-growth small-to-medium enterprises).According to Caroline and Kosmas, FGSMEs are firms that achieve at least 20% yearbook compound sales growth over a 5-year period. Birch (1995) found that FGSMEs farm up 3% of all small firms. Based on former look for, there are many firm- base characteristics, which are concentrated on both customers and organizations aspects, such as blessedness of customers, financial perspectives, staff retention, number and quality of successful innovations and so on, to dissever between FGSMEs and all other SMEs. 1. customer FocusFGSMEs are customer centric, regularly receiving feedback from clients and taking their requests and complaints seriously into consideration (Tan, 2007). They always try to retain clients through amend the quality of products and services or underdeveloped new p roducts. According to the BSC, customer perspectives center on on traditionalistic marketing issues such as market share, customer satisfaction and service quality ratings, customer loyalty, and customer perceived value (Kaplan &038 Norton, 2000). 2. Financial spots FGSMEs tend to spend a lot of time and effort in analyzing the financial health of their firms.On the contrary, other SMEs always canvass cash flows on a regular basis, relying on occasional back of the gasbag calculations. Financial summaries provided by accountants are used for mandatory reporting purposes instead of financial management (Barnes et al. , 1998). 3. Internal rail line Perspective Internal business performance indicators contains traditional operational terms such as tender success rate, data rejection percentages, time per customer (Kaplan &038 Norton, 2000), on-time delivery, the number of new products launched and product defects (Zaman, 2003).FGSMEs tend to manage and examine their business proce sses. For example, Liaise marketing (a supermarket broker) CEO, Tony Merlino stated that their firm measures manufacturer sales, market share and butt in visits to make sure that their sales team operates properly and efficiently. 4. Employee Focus Kaplan and Norton (2000) pointed that innovation, learning, and growth perspectives are closely linked to improve employee job satisfaction and commitment, and develop employees technical ability and innovation skills. According to the previous literature, FGSMEs face to pay a lot of attention on employees. Nicholls-Nixon, 2005 Tan, 2007). So we can see that these fast-growth firms all have a unafraid emphasis on making their employees as part of the performance standard system. caters ideas and feelings are very important and cannot be ignored easily. Conclusion This hit the books aims at identifying the factors that contribute to SMEs survival. Finding on the study suggests that effective financial management, owing(p) leadership and training play a critical role in SMEs survival, piece of music excessive depend on one or two customers(suppliers) will be dangerous and may lead to a death.On the other hand, the study makes a distinction between FGSMEs and other SMEs based on four perspectives, finally draw the conclusion that FGSMEs tend to pay more attention on customers, financial management, familiar business operation and employees. REFERENCE Astebro, T. and Bernhardt, I. 2009. Dissecting Behaviours Associated with calling Failure A Qualitative film of SME Owners in Malaysia and Australia. Journal of Asian social science 5 (9) 98104. Barnes, L. , Coulton. T. Dickinson. S. Dransfield, J. Field, N. Fisher, et al. 1998. A New Approach to Performance measurement for Small and sensitive Enterprises. Performance measurement theory and practice, 1, 86-92. BERR. 2002. ENTERPRISE UNLOCKING THE UKS TALENT. online. Accessed 9th February 2010. purchasable from World wide-cut Web < http//www. berr. gov. uk /files/file44992. pdf> Berry,M. 1998. strategical be after in Small last Tech Companies. Long Range Planning 31(3) 455-466 Birch, D. 1995. Whos Creating Jobs? Cambridge Cognetics, Inc. Birley, S. and Niktari, N. 1995. The Failure of Owner-Managed melodyes The Diagnosis of Accountants and Bankers.London lend of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. Caroline, S. T. and Kosmas, X. S. 2005. devoted performance measurement in fast growth small-to-medium enterprises online. Accessed 10th February 2010. easy from World panoptic Web European Commision. 2005. The new SME exposition User guide and model announcement online. Accessed 10th February 2010. in stock(predicate) from World Wide Web Enterprise Britain Growth, Innovation and globe Policy in the Small and Medium Sized Enterprises Sector. 19941997. Cambridge ESRC Centre for billet search, pp. 1627. Haugh.M and McKee. L. 2000. Survival, independence, control uncovering the shared out values in the SME. online. Acce ssed 12th February 2010. Available from World Wide Web Kaplan, R. S. , and D. P. Norton. 2000. The Strategy-Focused governing body How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Boston, MA Harvard Business School Press. Kitson, M. and Wilkinson, F. 1998. Employment structure, recruitment, labour turnover, training and labour force flexibility in Cosh, A. and Hughes, A. (eds), Natwest. 1997. Natwest Quarterly Survey of Small Business in Britain.Small Business Research Trust Nicholls-Nixon, C. L. (2005). Rapid Growth and lavishly Performance The Entrepreneurs Impossible Dream? Academy of management executive, 19(1), 77-89. Noor, H. A. 2003. Start-up financing, owner characteristics, and survival. Journal of political economy and Business 55 (2003) 303319. Stanworth, J. and Gray, C. 1992. Entrepreneurship and education action-based research and training policy implications in Britain. world(prenominal) Small Business Journal 10(2), 1123. Schaefer, P. 2006. The seven pitfalls of business failures and how to avoid them. Accessed 9th February 2010 Available from World Wide Web www. usinessknowhow. com/inauguration/business-failure. html Tan, C. S. L. 2007. Sources of Competitive Advantage for rising Fast Growth Small-to-Medium Enterprises The Role of Business Orientation, Marketing Capabilities, Customer Value and Firm Performance. RMIT University, Melbourne. Zaman, M. 2003. Balanced Scorecard Implementation in Australian Companies an Exploratory Study of current Corporate Practice and Strategic Intent. reputation presented at the Hawaii International gathering on Business.