Friday, February 1, 2019
Animal Experimentation and Research Essay -- Ethics Morals Essays Pape
sentient being Experimentation and ResearchIn the basement of the psychology department here, a poster hangs on the wall on it is a picture of two white lab rats and a legend that reads, ?They?ve saved more lives than 911.? This poster hangs on the wall of the room where I performed brain surgery on a rat. Many people would be morally opposed to this and any other form of animal research and experiment and tang that it should be banned. This heated grapple has been going on for centuries with each side possessing strong arguments. A central argument to this debate is whether or not animals are moral patients, with feelings anId the ability to suffer, and if we as valet de chambre are entitled to use them as means. Many people feel that we have made great medical advancements that would not have been achievable without the use of animals. Alternatively, some feel that despite the medical advancements made, the use of animals remains an unethical practice. I feel that a nimal experimentation has the capacity to be very beneficial to medical research. However, scientists should try to prevent as oftentimes suffering as possible. Likewise, it would be a good idea to nix unnecessary testing and experimentation, especially with the recent development of many alternatives. disrespect mounting controversy, many people still find animal experimentation to be a moral and correct practice. A widely legitimate thought of some philosophers is that animals are not morally equal to us therefore, we do not have to treat them as such (Fox, 3). Furthermore, tally to Michael Allen Fox, author of The Case for Animal Experimentation, ?animals fail to meet the conditions specified for adequate membership in the moral community and likewise fail to... ...on, this print will be able to be solved and a popular understanding and agreement can arise.Works Cited Birke, Lynda and Michael, Mike. ?Ethics and Animal Rights augment Beyond UK Law.? Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy constitute 35-38 Fox, Michael Allen. The Case for Animal Experimentation. Berkley University of California Press, 1986. Langley, Gill, ed.. Animal Experimentation The Consensus Changes. New York Chapman and Hall, 1989. Mench, Joy. ?Animal Research Arouses Passion, Sparks.? Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy pass over 1996 5-15. Rachels, James. The Elements of Moral Philosophy. New York McGraw-Hill, 2003. ?Rights from Wrongs.? The Environmental Magazine. March/April. 2008 26-33. Singer, Peter. Practical Ethics. New York Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment