Do Not Learn as a Machine Essay Example for Free

Do Not Learn as a automobile EssayIts twelve at night. Tons of papers and a cup of coffee on the desk prepared for pulling an all-nighter. Studying for the exam tomorrow, cramming tons of class-notes and materials. Students are fighting for an A. However, what do we expect them to take up from it? Is it even beneficial to them? After all, most students forget almost everything as soon as they dismiss the exam. Apparently, there are some(a) fundamental problems in our current educational remains.In the three essays, The Banking opinion of Education by Paulo Freire, Against teach by John Taylor Gatto and The Achievement of Desire by Richard Rodriguez, the authors realize variant problems of the educational musical arrangement and incur different opinions around it. In my point of view, the main problem in the current educational system is that it encourages students to receive information meekly, without doubting, questioning or even understanding the material. As a resu lt, these students resemble machines which acquire many facts but substructure barely develop their own full of life recollecting.The three aforementioned authors have differing opinions on the current educational system, but they all describe it as a system where students merely receive information but do not undergo vituperative thinking. In Against School, Gatto states that the educational system is a scheme the government uses to make people more governable by reducing their critical judgment. To achieve this, school provide answers of every question to the students. It works because at large(p) answers have removed the need to wonder questions (Gatto 155). It is true.Since students were taught in their early life that teachers are absolutely right, and that they should practise the authorities, as a result, most of them do not judge the teachers explanations. As they grow up, students tend to regain the answers from books or teachers or else of figuring the answer ou t by themselves. Thus, their critical and original thinking have been obliterated completely under this educational system. Moreover, the boredom of schooling prosperously removes the students curiosity which drive them to ask questions. A similar idea appears in The Banking Concept of Education.Freire uses the term banking system to describe the educational system where the teachers deposit a large amount of knowledge on the students. Students soon become receptacles which extend notwithstanding as far as receiving, filling, and storing the deposits (Freire 1). These students do not understand how the information related to the real world, and can neither apply the knowledge to the real world problem nor develop their own critical thinking. In The Achievement of Desire, Rodriguez mainly describes his early life as a successful student.It stops a cover example to support Gatto and Freires opinion. As he describes himself as a great mimic a collector of thoughts, not a thinker (2 03), it fits Gatto and Freires description about the educational system, that even a considerably successful student could not perform critical and original thinking. Under this type of educational system, students try to find their instruction to achieve graduate(prenominal) scores. However, it turns out that the surpass way to be successful in this system isnt the best way to regulate.In the essays, the authors describe how the successful student is like. agree to Freire, The more meekly the receptacles permit themselves to be filled, the better students they are (1). In order to be considered full(a) under this system, students need to receive a large amount of facts on a superficial direct. The best strategy is not to think, not to question, just believe and memorize it. Freire observes a phenomena in which teachers talk about contents which are detached from reality, disconnected from the totality that engendered them (1).In this way, students acquire tons of facts and m aybe farm their memorization ability, but fail to understand how these facts are connected to the daily life. In The Achievement of Desire, Rodriguez realizes that he was the worst student, even though he was considered successful in the system. He becomes in every plain way the worst student, a dummy mouthing the opinions of others. But he would not be so high-risknor would he become so successful, a scholarship boyif he did not accurately dig that the best synonym for primary education is imitation (203).The scholarship boy noticed that the best way to succeed in this system is to borrow and copy the ideas of others. Clearly we know that this is not the way to learn, as learning requires original processes. Therefore, it can be concluded that being successful in the educational system is not the same as being successful in learning. My experience supports this. Some teachers in my high school ask students to memorize all the model answers to every possible question that might be asked on the standardized test, but do not give explanations or have activities which could actually stand by students understand.The aim of teaching would past become merely the test scores. My physics teacher kept reminding us how many students got an A in a standardized test under his training, which emphasized becoming machines for solution problems. Being these machines could improve our performance on a test however, we did not retain any self-colored knowledge throughout the class, some even losing the motivation to learn afterwards. Solutions to a problem can be simple once we understand the cause of it. In the essays, the authors suggest their individual solutions.Freire suggests to oppose the banking system, by implementing a problem-posing system. In a problem-posing system, teachers pose some problems related to the world and ask the students to attempt to solve them without a straight forward answer (Freire 7). Students would then have the chance to explore the respective topic by themselves, think about every possible solution creatively. It takes time for all students to figure out the answer, and some of them may even fail to do it, but at least each student has tried to think about the problem.In this way, students are learning the material cognitively, and hence they will understand it more deeply and be able to apply the knowledge to the real world. Moreover, this system can motivate students to learn. concord to Freire, Students, as they are increasingly posed with problems relating to themselves in the world and with the world, will feel increasingly challenged and oblige to respond to that challenge (8). When students try solving the problem, they are not being narrated by the boring materials and instead use their creative brainpower.They will find it fun to learn in this way and grow an fervency to continue learning. In Against School, Gatto suggests to do the retrograde of the schools mediocre influence on children. School trains children to be employees and consumers teach your own to be leaders and adventurers. School trains children to obey reflexively teach your own to think critically and independently (155). To do this, we can educate children not only by books, but too encourage them to join different kinds of extra-curriculum activities such that they can grow interest in all areas.As an international student, I always compare the educational systems in America and Macau. I found that the educational system in America is relatively more problem-posing than my early education in Macau. Professors always give us chance to discuss and have more in-class activities. I fit in this problem-posing system and consequently I can learn better and understand concepts more clearer. In conclusion, in order to learn cognitively and acquire the true knowledge, students should try to understand the materials before they decide to believe and cram it.Doxa manner common beliefs and facts, while logos means the principle of knowledge. When students deeply understand it, they will attain the level of logos, not only doxa. It gives the students knowledge as well as the skill to derive other truths. To ward off being a machine, we should have our own thought and creativity. In the ideal problem-posing system, students can explore it in their way but not copying others ideas because they do not need to worry about their grades. They would then have their original opinion and thought, instead of meekly receiving information, being a mindless machine.